Industrial-policy correction
Assess a disputed advisory, circular or administrative requirement; assemble the factual record; and formulate a proportionate, lawful request for clarification or review.
TLGS specialist practice
Comprehensive support for companies and industry bodies facing consequential regulatory constraints across industrial operations, import logistics and central-authority policy processes.
A multidisciplinary response
When an operating constraint affects multiple companies or supply chains, the response may need more than individual compliance action. TLGS structures the legal, technical, commercial and institutional work needed to present a clear, evidence-led policy case.
Assess a disputed advisory, circular or administrative requirement; assemble the factual record; and formulate a proportionate, lawful request for clarification or review.
Connect an import or port-level constraint with its commercial, regulatory and downstream industrial implications, without treating operating permissions as a substitute for safety compliance.
Build a coherent industry case from member inputs, distinguish common issues from individual claims and prepare consistent representations and consultation material.
Combine domain-specialist analysis with legal interpretation and the views of the relevant authorities, while preserving the distinction between an advocate’s submission and an official finding.
Scope related DPIIT, DGFT, customs and other central-authority requirements according to the actual issue. DGFT-facing work is a broader service capability, not a claim that DGFT participated in this particular case.
Track the applicable written decision, its scope and remaining conditions; organise implementation communication and coordinate authorised legal professionals where proceedings are involved.
Our work · Industrial policy & regulatory alignment
Completed policy and regulatory advisory for Special Blasts Limited, SBL Energy Limited and affected EMWA members, now documented alongside MoPSW’s 17 March 2026 removal of paragraph 2(v) of its ammonium nitrate port advisory. The engagement addressed an overnight-berthing constraint affecting industrial supply chains.
TLGS scope completedEach engagement starts with the relevant documents, affected activity, decision sought and competent authorities. Client-specific disputes, court proceedings and reserved professional work are separately scoped and coordinated with appropriately authorised professionals.
Past engagement outcomes are not guarantees. The SBL / EMWA case does not establish a general exemption for regulated goods, or imply DGFT participation in that particular matter.
Bharat Pulse · Industrial policy
The SBL / EMWA case now includes MoPSW’s 17 March 2026 amendment: the removal of a specific port-advisory paragraph, the continuing safety framework and the commercial relevance of a documented policy correction.
Published 13 September 2026 · Updated 3 October 2026 with the official letters · Decision date: 17 March 2026.
For companies & industry bodies
Bring the relevant advisory, circular or regulatory issue to TLGS. Our team can assess the evidence, applicable framework and appropriate representation or clarification route.